Captain Sanusi has strongly opposed the potential reinstatement of the suspended $300 landing fees on oil rigs and other offshore platforms. Similarly, he argues that imposing such charges without corresponding investments is unjustified and counterproductive.
“You cannot charge for landing on property that does not belong to you,” Sanusi stated. “If an aircraft lands behind someone’s house, who exactly are we paying? Such fees cannot be justified when there is no investment from the authority imposing the charge.” His critique underscores the principle that fees must align with ownership or clear infrastructural contributions.
The Aero Contractors CEO praised the Aviation Minister’s decision to suspend the fee, labeling it a step in the right direction. Furthermore, he cautioned that reintroducing the charge would create additional burdens for airlines already grappling with operational challenges. He also stressed that aviation taxes should prioritize cost recovery instead of placing undue strain on operators. Read More: Naebi Dynamics: Keyamo Suspends Controversial $300 Chopper Landing Levy
Advocacy for Streamlined Charges
Sanusi also highlighted the inefficiencies caused by the multiplicity of charges in the industry, advocating for a more streamlined approach. Moreover, he proposed consolidating various charges into a single fee that can be shared among regulatory agencies.
“We currently pay five percent of our ticket sales to the NCAA, alongside separate fees for inspections, Air Operator Certificate renewals, and en route navigation,” he explained. “Consolidating these into one tax would simplify processes and reduce costs for domestic airlines.”
He further suggested that domestic airlines should not bear multiple navigation fees for en route and terminal use. Instead, he proposed merging these charges, allowing agencies to split the revenue equitably. Sanusi argued that such reforms would enhance the financial stability of airlines while maintaining regulatory efficiency.
Concerns Over Monopolistic Practices
Sanusi also criticized the monopolistic tendencies of two ground handling companies, which recently increased their service fees by 600%. He argued that this move stifles competition and sets a harmful precedent in the industry.
“The NCAA’s approval of this price hike undermines fair competition,” Sanusi stated. “Allowing two companies to dominate the market without accommodating new entrants harms the industry. If airlines imposed minimum prices, it would be condemned, yet handling companies can dictate prices unchecked.” Connect Aeromro
To address these concerns, Sanusi revealed that he had filed formal complaints with consumer protection agencies, anti-competition bodies, and the Senate as well. He further called for regulatory intervention to curb monopolistic practices and promote a free-market economy.
Advocating Industry Reforms
Captain Sanusi’s criticisms of the reproposed suspended $300 landing fee and monopolistic practices in the aviation sector underscore the need for regulatory reforms. Additionally, his advocacy for streamlined charges and fair competition reflects a commitment to reducing operational burdens and fostering growth. By addressing these pressing issues, Nigeria’s aviation industry can achieve greater efficiency and sustainability.
