Home Analysis How Nigeria Escaped 2009 Blacklist After Underwear Bomb Plot

How Nigeria Escaped 2009 Blacklist After Underwear Bomb Plot

233
0
Nigeria escaped aviation blacklist
Dr. Harold Demuren
UBA Tap to Pay

In a gripping account, Dr. Harold Demuren recalls how Nigeria narrowly avoided global aviation disgrace after the 2009 underwear bombing attempt by Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab. Despite limited technology, swift coordination, biometric tracking, and leadership helped Nigeria prove compliance, shielding it from blacklist. ANTHONY OMOH writes.


In December 2009, Nigeria escaped aviation blacklist after a near-catastrophic security breach involving a Nigerian national, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab. His failed attempt to detonate an explosive device aboard a U.S.-bound flight Northwest Airlines flight on December 25 triggered global scrutiny, but what could have irreparably damaged Nigeria’s aviation integrity was contained—thanks to effective collaboration, swift leadership, and surprisingly, basic but functional technology.

In a stirring recollection of one of Nigeria’s most critical security turning points, Dr. Harold Olusegun Demuren, former Director General of the Nigeria Civil Aviation Authority (NCAA) and President of the ICAO 37th General Assembly, recounted this incident that shook Nigeria aviation to the core. At the recent Aviation Security High-Level Stakeholders’ Symposium, where he delivered a keynote titled “The Fundamentality of Aviation Security in Achieving the Safe-Skies Goal.” Dr. Demuren  spoke about Northwest Airlines Flight 253 operating the route from Amsterdam Schiphol Airport to Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport.

A Wake-Up Call in the Early Hours

“I was called by the Minister then around 2am, Chief Omotoba, who asked me if I was seeing CNN,” Dr. Demuren recalled. “I quickly switched on and all I saw was Nigeria, Nigeria, Nigeria, watchlist, underpants bomber… I quickly called my team.”

As the then Chairman of the National Aviation Security Apparatus, Demuren immediately activated Nigeria’s internal crisis response. The urgency of the moment demanded swift investigation and strategic diplomacy.

“At a point,” he continued, “the then Acting President, Dr. Goodluck Jonathan, called me directly. He wanted to know the whole story. I calmed him down and assured him that we were going to get back with the full facts. This had rocked everyone, including the Presidency itself.”

It was a national emergency that pierced every level of government, triggering unprecedented coordination between aviation agencies, immigration authorities, and security operatives.

Timeline of a Terror Suspect

On December 24, 2009, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, 23, boarded a KLM flight from Murtala Muhammed International Airport (MMIA), Lagos, to Detroit via Amsterdam. Concealed in his underwear was an explosive device he later attempted to detonate mid-flight.

Nigeria escaped aviation blacklist
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab

Abdulmutallab had flown into Lagos from Accra, Ghana, that same evening aboard a Virgin Nigeria flight, arriving at 8:07 p.m. He presented himself at Nigerian Immigration, and by 8:35 p.m., had checked in at the KLM counter, where he was confirmed to have done so personally supported by CCTV footage provided by the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN).

He carried no checked luggage, only a carry-on bag, and proceeded through security checks including walk-through metal detectors, X-ray screening machines, and secondary boarding gate inspection, as verified by KLM and FAAN surveillance.

At the time, Nigeria had not yet deployed full-body scanners or advanced explosives detection systems. Still, he was processed under the existing protocols—clear evidence that Nigeria’s systems, though basic, were operational.

How Rudimentary Tech Made the Difference

Though far from cutting-edge, the airport’s check-in system operated by MAEVIS (owned by Chief Fagbemi) ensured traceability. Immigration captured Abdulmutallab’s biometric data with timestamp accuracy. CCTV cameras logged his every movement.

It was this verifiable audit trail that proved crucial in showing the world that Nigeria had fulfilled its security obligations.

As Dr. Demuren put it, “We had video records, timestamps, and a clear audit trail. From immigration capture to boarding gate, every step was accounted for. That was our shield.”

These events underscored how *Nigeria escaped aviation blacklist* not through advanced scanners, but by maximizing what it already had—systems, documentation, and a spirit of cooperation.

Global Fallout and the Watchlist Blow

Despite Nigeria’s documented compliance, the failed attack led to immediate global fallout. Nigeria, alongside 14 other countries including Iran, Yemen, and Afghanistan, was placed on the United States’ ‘Countries of Interest’ watchlist—a designation that Demuren described as “degrading and deeply unfair.”

He particularly questioned the exclusion of the United Kingdom, where Abdulmutallab had been radicalized, obtained his U.S. visa, and where Richard Reid, the so-called ‘Shoe Bomber,’ had once plotted a similar attack aboard an American Airlines flight from Paris to Miami in 2001.

“It wasn’t just about fairness,” Demuren argued. “It was about credibility and global consistency in aviation oversight.”

National Action and Security Overhaul

In response to the international backlash, Nigeria implemented enhanced security procedures across all its airports. The NCAA mandated 100% screening compliance for all passengers and crew. No one would board without undergoing every layer of aviation security.

In addition, 3D total body imaging scanners were introduced, and explosives trace detection technology was gradually deployed at key points of entry.

Training for aviation security personnel was expanded, and procedural audits were intensified in collaboration with foreign partners and local agencies.

Demuren emphasized that Nigeria’s swiftness in taking action, even before external pressures forced its hand, was pivotal in shifting perceptions.

Taking the Fight to Canberra

In January 2010, Nigeria made its case at the AVSEC Panel Committee Meeting in Canberra, Australia. With a full dossier of evidence—from immigration logs to video surveillance—Dr. Demuren and the NCAA challenged the fairness of Nigeria’s watchlist inclusion.

The message was clear: Abdulmutallab was properly documented and screened in Nigeria. He had boarded the aircraft undetected not due to local failure, but because his concealment method beat conventional screening globally, as it had in other countries prior.

The Game-Changer: Abuja 2010

Nigeria’s efforts culminated in the ICAO Regional Aviation Security Conference, hosted in Abuja from April 12–13, 2010.

All 37 African Ministers of Transport and Aviation, the ICAO Secretary General, ambassadors, IATA, and U.S. Homeland Security representatives were present.

There, Janet Napolitano, the then U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security, officially announced Nigeria’s removal from the watchlist—a massive diplomatic and regulatory victory.

Demuren Credits National Teamwork

Toward the end of his address, Dr. Demuren shared a deeply personal reflection, underscoring the importance of inter-agency cooperation:

 “You see, I did not do it alone. There were officers of the Nigerian Immigration who captured Abdulmutallab to the seconds on their systems. These were some of the things we used to defend ourselves. It was pure synergy. We worked together and eventually we were removed. Truth is—without that synergy, who knows? So, it wasn’t about me. I was just the point man. It was about FAAN, MAEVIS, Immigration, and everyone who showed up and ensured we were triumphant.”

This statement encapsulated the true essence of Nigeria’s success—it wasn’t the equipment alone; it was people, process, and partnership.

Looking Ahead: Eternal Vigilance Required

Dr. Demuren concluded with a cautionary note. The aviation security landscape continues to evolve, and no country can afford to rest on its past achievements.

“What worked in 2009 may not work today. We must keep investing—not only in technology but in synergy, training, and awareness,” he said.

For Nigeria, the Abdulmutallab case remains both a warning and a milestone. It highlighted weaknesses, but it also showcased a nation’s capacity to rise under pressure, reform its systems, and reclaim its dignity.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here