The trial of the Managing Director of the Nigeria Airspace Management Agency (NAMA), Ibrahim Abdulsalam, with six others charged for alleged theft of N6.9b at the Federal High Court, Ikoyi Lagos has been shifted to May 12 following the prayers of defence counsel to the accused.
Abdulsalam Adegorite Olumuyiwa, Agbolade Segun, Clara Aliche, Joy Adegorite, and two Limited Liability companies, Randville Investment Ltd and Multeng Travels and Tours Ltd are standing trial for stealing and conversion of the agency’s money amounting to N6.9 billion.
When the case was called Wednesday, the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) lawyer, Rotimi Oyedepo, informed the court that his witnesses were present in court.
He reminded the court that the case was adjourned to April 27 and April 28 for trial, adding that the prosecution was ready to proceed with the trial.
Counsel to the accused, Wale Akoni (SAN), however opposed the prayer for the commencement of trial on the grounds that he required time to discuss with his client.
He also pointed out that he had not had sufficient time to peruse the proof of evidence, so as to enable him prepare for trial.
The counsel, therefore, urged the court to grant an adjournment in favour of the accused, in the interest of Justice.
Consequently, Justice Babs Kuewumi, adjourned the case to May 12 for trial, while he vacated the previous date of April 28.
The EFCC had on April 7, arraigned the NAMA boss, three directors of the agency and the wife of one of the directors, before the court on the allegation that on Aug. 19, 2013, the accused conspired to induce NAMA to deliver the sum of N2.8 billion to Delosa Ltd, Air Sea Delivery Ltd and Sea Schedules Systems Ltd.
EFCC also alleged that the delivery was under the pretence that the money represented the cost of clearing NAMA’s consignments.
It was also alleged that between January 2 and December 17, 2013, the defendants allegedly converted N191 million belonging to NAMA to themselves.
They were said to have also converted N728 million between 2013 and 2015, as well as other sums.
The alleged offence is said to have contravened the provisions of Sections 8 (a) of the Advance Fee Fraud and other Fraud Related Offences Act, 2006 and punishable under Section 1 (3).
All accused had pleaded not guilty to the charge. The charge was subsequently amended to include three more accused persons, and all accused persons where re-arraigned on April 12.